- Comment
- Published:
- S. E. Mokken1,
- M. Özer ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-25702,3 &
- F. W. Timmermans ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-959X1
International Journal of Impotence Research volume35,page 323 (2023)Cite this article
-
215 Accesses
-
1 Citations
-
3 Altmetric
-
Metrics details
Subjects
- Quality of life
- Urinary tract
With great interest, we read the study of Hammond et al. titled: “Foreskin Restorers: Insights into Motivations, Successes, Challenges and Experiences with Medical and Mental Health Professionals”. In this study they describe the profile and motivations of people seeking foreskin reconstruction. Foreskin reconstruction refers to the process of extending the remaining skin on a circumcised penis to create the appearance of a natural, unaltered foreskin. This can be done through various methods such as manual stretching or the use of devices. In this study, they sought out a large population of participants, through unconventional channels with a resultantly large response to an extensive qualitative questionnaire. Great emphasis was laid on addressing different motivational experiential domains regarding foreskin reconstruction such as experienced sexuality, psychological burden, and societal experience.
The results of the study are quite profound and identify a population that largely refrains from seeking professional help in up to 87% of the participants. This may be in part due to selection bias by sampling from an internet community and buyers of home-bought foreskin device manufacturers. Nonetheless, in this study, we gain insight into a population underserved by the medical profession. Another remarkable outcome of this study was the reported age groups during which participants started performing foreskin reconstruction. A reported 8% started before the age of 18 and 34% between the ages 20–29. The experienced burden, sexual impairment, and affected self-image might therefore impact the rest of their lives greatly and disproportionately.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Change institution
Buy or subscribe
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
261,46€ per year
only 32,68 € per issue
Learn more
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Wallace WG. An undeniable need for recognition: what do you call a man who has undergone foreskin restoration? “Uncircumcised”? “Restored”? How about just BRAVE? A response to Hill (2015). Clin Anat. 2015;28:962–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22600.
Timmermans FW, Mokken SE, Poor Toulabi SCZ, Bouman MB, Ozer M. A review on the history of and treatment options for foreskin reconstruction after circumcision. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:424–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00438-3.
Ozer M, Timmermans FW. An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:611–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0223-y.
Townsend KG. Defending an inclusive right to genital and bodily integrity for children. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00503-x.
Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity. Medically unnecessary genital cutting and the rights of the child: moving toward consensus. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1643945.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
S. E. Mokken&F. W. Timmermans
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, BovenIJ Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M. Özer
Plastic and Reconstructive Genital Surgery, V-Klinieken, Leiden/Naarden, The Netherlands
M. Özer
Authors
- S. E. Mokken
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- M. Özer
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- F. W. Timmermans
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
SEM: writing – original draft, MO: writing – original draft and writing – review and editing, FWT: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, and supervision.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to F. W. Timmermans.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mokken, S.E., Özer, M. & Timmermans, F.W. Comment: Foreskin restorers: insights into motivations, successes, challenges and experiences with medical and mental health professionals. Int J Impot Res 35, 323 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00693-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00693-6
This article is cited by
-
Child genital cutting and surgery across cultures, sex, and gender. Part 2: assessing consent and medical necessity in “endosex” modifications
- Brian D. Earp
- Jasmine Abdulcadir
- Lih-Mei Liao
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)